On Jul 2, 2011, at 12:15 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > I find it quite unhealthy that a thread which began with the > announcement that one of the members of this podling that he "started > with a Apache Stanbol documentation" has now been transformed into an > OT-thread about pagerank and SEO (and how the Apache Way does not work, > which in my opinion is the core of the differences).
I have never said that. > Even more unhealthy is that for one member the existence of a "nofollow" > HTML-attribute seems to be so important that he indicated that he might > have made his agreement with "moving the project to Apache" dependent on > the non-use of that attribute. I haven't said that (and if I said it - too tired to check - I didn't mean it). What I mean is that there is a reality, that this project is mostly developed by the IKS project, and this can't be ignored. > I do not see how such an attitude (and the aggressive tone involved) can > help improving Apache Stanbol or develop *any* Open Source community. It > takes time and energy away especially from creating and improving > documentation - which is urgently needed to attract both, more users and > more (and more productive) developers. Indeed. Will you be there at the workshop in Paris next week ? S. -- Stefane Fermigier, Founder and Chairman, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com/ - +33 1 40 33 79 87 - http://twitter.com/sfermigier Join the Nuxeo Group on LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/groups?gid=43314 New Nuxeo release: http://nuxeo.com/dm54 "There's no such thing as can't. You always have a choice."
