Tomasz Sterna wrote: > Dnia 10-08-2007, pią o godzinie 16:11 +0100, Richard Dobson napisał(a): >> In that case you would just ignore the attempted shake for people who >> you dont want to be able to do it (and probably return an error of >> some sort), but you can still publish that you allow it in your caps >> if you allow it for some people in your roster, > > Maybe we should think of extending Caps to allow publishing different > capabilities to different contacts.
Over complicated. We made some tradeoffs with caps (and indeed with presence itself) by using a broadcast model. If you don't want to advertise a feature to everyone in your roster, don't include it in the hash. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
