Sergei Golovan wrote: > On 8/11/07, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> The more I think about it, the more it seems to me that this kind of >> feature is a "throwaway" -- do you really need to receive a reply? You >> just want to poke the other person. There's no need for a reliable >> transport with fancy error messages and all that. > > I think that if we can make less uncertainty an no cost (almost no > cost) we should always do that. If a client author doesn't want to > process replies it's up to him to ignore them.
But the recipient must send a reply if we use IQ, which seems wasteful for a little toy like this. /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
