On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 09:59:17AM -0700, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 April 2010 04:05:32 Dave Cridland wrote:
> > Besides which, it's really not that much effort on the part of the
> > server to translate between namespaces, surely?
> 
> It's awkward usage of XML.  I'd like to phase out such usages that cause 
> people to react with "what were they thinking?".  Standardizing on 
> jabber:client for stanzas, regardless of the stream they are carried over, is 
> the right move.

Why not start phasing out both jabber:client and jabber:server in favour
or some proper name space? We won't get rid of jabber:server with
breaking some compatibility, anyway?

Greets,
        Jacek

Reply via email to