On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Kurt Zeilenga <kurt.zeile...@isode.com> wrote: > I don’t think it’s appropriate to add Carbons to core when it seems that > there’s not consensus that it’s the best solution for any problem the > majority of XMPP IM/MUC deployments are facing.
I'm not entirely sure that experimental XEPs should be core either, on the other hand, the community (people actually running servers) seem to have decided that it's core without any help from us. There are lots and lots of servers out there running carbons, and it seems to solve the problem it was designed to solve quite well (even if there are other possible, or even better, solutions). On the other hand, I really don't like the idea of an experimental XEP being recommended by the XSF as a core feature (that sends a mixed message in my mind). Maybe we should wait on some sort of concensus to form on the advancement thread I started before thinking about carbons and instead focus on other XEPs that may be good candidates for recommendation here? —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com
