Sat, 1 Aug 2015 14:51:19 -0500 Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote:
> If Content-MD5 were to be supported in particular it would probably > have to be something that clients supported, eg. > > <header name="Content-MD5" /> > Another issue is how to pass this data to the file recipient. While it looks obvious to pass an url, passing headers looks not that simple and XEP doesn't describe that as it stands for "Upload" only. I think there is no much sense to describe headers in this XEP without suggesting rules on passing this data to the file recipients.
