Thanks for doing these! Really appreciated.
On 28 February 2017 at 16:37, JC Brand <li...@opkode.com> wrote: > XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017 > ===================================== > > Present: daniel, Tobias, Link Mauve, SamWhited, Dave Cridland > Minute taker: jcbrand > > 1). Clarify CSI and Carbons state after SM resumption > > Tobias: Flow created PRs which clarify things and asked council to review. > Would be nice if people could do so. > > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/427 > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/428 > > Daniel asks where we are currently with the NS bump for carbons and whether > it's necessary. > > Tobias mentions that he hasn't read through all the feedback yet. > > Link Mauve mentions that a NS bump is required due to the removal of > <private>. > > Daniel says that some people want to keep <private>. > > Dave Cridland says that Georg Lukas has decided to put together a PR > as a concrete proposal. > > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/434 > > Dave Cridland says he's happy to have a namespace bump as long as implementors > follow up and don't stick on the old one. He therefore wants some feedback on > the above pull request. > > SamWhited and Tobias say they'll read the proposal. > > Daniel says he can live with a version bump but thinks only removing of > <private> doesn't make it worth it. > > Link Mauve says that the rules definition from Georg also justify a namespace > bump. > > Link Mauve suggests asking that #428 not bump the namespace, and to let > the editor bump it manually once all of the changes are gathered. > > SamWhited says that he prefers that it bumps the namespace and he'll then > merge > several other changes (if there are any) and then do a collective revision > bump. > > Dave Cridland says he'd rather bump than risk incompatible deployments. > > 2) Georg opened an PR on MUC private messages, > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/436 > > Tobias suggests that council members give it a review and to vote on it next > week so that there's time to incorporate a review feedback early on. > > Link Mauve is +1 since it does solve the issue. > > Dave Cridland thinks it needs some security considerations, in particular > around replacing/removing client-added <x/> stuff. > > daniel says he's going to vote +1 for it. > > 3) Date of next meeting > > Tobias: that would be 2017-03-08, 16:00 UTC > > Everyone agrees. > > 4) Any other business > > 4.1) Dave Cridland wonders whether a GSoC provides an opportunity to create > project > to help with complex bits of editor automation. Suggests a discussion between > the editors and Kev. He suggests pre-rendering of PRs. > > SamWhited likes the idea of making such a project. > > Tobias says we can make a "XSF" project on the GSoC ideas page but warns that > it must be enough to full a GSoC term. > > SamWhited says there's plenty of stuff to keep a student busy. > > 4.2) SamWhited mentions that outstanding LCs end tomorrow again. > > Tobias says he'll do some reading/voting later today. > > Tobias bangs the gavel. > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
