Am 25.05.2017 um 15:49 schrieb Remko Tronçon:
>> There are concerns about the usage of XEdDSA, which could be solved by
>> either implementing the XEdDSA conversion function in a non-GPL way
> This would help, but I'll still feel very uneasy until it is available in an 
> accepted crypto library. 
>
> Other than that, I agree with your summary. 
>
>
>> Either way, are there any other points speaking against Andys PR?
> Yes: the wire format isn't specified (how is chain length etc. authenticated)

So if that last part is resolved (which shouldn't be a big deal), then
Andys PR would be an accpetable compromise for everyone, am I right?
Its nice to see some progress in that case :)

Vanitasvitae

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to