On 31 May 2017 at 20:44, Daniel Gultsch <dan...@gultsch.de> wrote: > Well not going against the entire OMEMO community would be a first > good step. >
This is harsh, given all attempts I have done to find solutions that make 'the OMEMO community' happy, and open up the protocol to as many implementations as possible. To me, such a statement makes it sound like 'the OMEMO community' is not open to wider standardization if it means it requires changes that aren't proposed by them. This would be sad. Remko
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
