On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Ignat Gavrilov <ignat.gavri...@mailfence.com> wrote: > I would propose that those people, who think that those who proposed UX > breaking changes start putting their effort into OMEMO-NEXT and leave the > OMEMO people working on "their standard". No reason to torpedo each other. We > could just resolve the split in the community by splitting the XEP - given > that no one *wants* to torpedo the other ones standard. (Feedback will still > be perfectly possible from each other, but I have the feeling a lot of this > is no longer feedback...)
In theory this is the purpose of "experimental" XEPS, but in practice I think people mostly just get confused about what the "recommended" spec is and get annoyed that there are two specs with duplicate functionality. I personally don't like the idea of having multiple XEPs with the same or heavily overlapping purposes for this reason. The whole "cutting the baby in half" thing only works if someone is concerned enough for the welfare of OMEMO to give up their half. —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
