On Dienstag, 12. September 2017 12:05:27 CEST Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: > Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:02:26 +0100 > > Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > > I don't think so. We're just adding an element, so it could be done > > with just a new disco feature, I think. > > Hum, am I missed something? Strict xmpp entities could not allow > elements not defined in schema, no?
You are wrong, I think. RFC 6120, Section 11.4 Validation: > Clients are advised not to rely on the ability to send data that does not > conform to the schemas, and SHOULD ignore any non-conformant elements or > attributes on the incoming XML stream. "schemas" in there refers to the RFC 6120 schemas, but I think this generalizes nicely. That is the whole point of extensibility. (Also, XML Schemas in XEPs are non-normative anyways from my understanding. Possibly for this exact reason.) kind regards, Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
