On 5 Oct 2017, at 10:54, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote: > > On 05.10.2017 11:20, Kevin Smith wrote: >> I’m not sure that the sides need to agree on timeouts. As long as each side >> does sensible pinging (only when the stream is silent) and not blindly every >> X seconds, they can both satisfy whatever their own requirements are.> That >> effectively leads to the same result as negotiation, > > No it does not. > >> as the shorter timeout wins, pretty much. > > Correct, which could lead to the pathological case where the server > pings the mobile device while it is asleep, causing it to wake up. > Agreeing on an inactivity timeout, as I described, would prevent that. > Which is what you usually want in most cases where XMPP is used with a > mobile client.
What you’re talking about there, then isn’t so much negotiation as instruction from the client to the server. Which might be appropriate in some circumstances. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
