Am Mi., 14. Nov. 2018 um 19:52 Uhr schrieb Georg Lukas <ge...@op-co.de>:
>
> * Jonas Schäfer <jo...@wielicki.name> [2018-10-20 13:55]:
> > 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
>
> A point that I brought up back then, and that I think needs to be added
> in §2.2 is this:
>
> | The message sender MUST set the stanza's @id to the same value as the
> | origin-id.
>
> The example should be changed accordingly.
>
> There is really no drawback in specifying that (as a MUST, or at least a
> SHOULD), and there is a huge amount of pain and madness later down the
> road if we don't mandate it. In my eyes, this is the only reasonable way
> to move forward.
>
> Therefore I change my vote to -1 unless the above statement is added
> with either a SHOULD or (preferrably) a MUST.

I raised the some concerns multiple times on I’m also -1 on that
before this addressed.
Especially since I don’t see a reason for *not* doing this even if
some people thing it is not needed.

cheers
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to