On 13/03/2019 22.16, Kevin Smith wrote:
On 13 Mar 2019, at 17:37, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
I can help, but I would not object to adding a more active co-author
(preferably an implementor of the spec).
Do you want to request a last call? Under the new rules Council aren’t allowed
to trigger an LC any more unless either the authors request it or the authors
abandon the XEP.
Kev,
I think this is a very narrow reading of the new text, and I don't agree
that this says the Approving Body cannot issue (=/= trigger) a Last
Call, via the Editor, if it so sees fit. What the changed text is meant
to ensure is that once a Last Call is issued, there's somebody, either
an author or document shepherd, to process feedback of that Last Call
and during the approval process of the Approving Body. And that there's
a defined way to propose advancement by authors, or others in case it
appears that the authors are no longer interested in such advancement.
If you think this new wording suggests that the Approving Body (in this
case Council) is no longer in full control of the process, then please
propose changes so this can be rectified.
--
ralphm
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________
