My low reguard for LILO and Win2000 is that if you are using the Win2000
bootloader LILO will properly include it up but if, for whatever reason, you
should decide to remove LILO using the standard fdisk/MBR it will also
remove your Win2000 bootloader and even the Rescue disk will be able to
restore it.
This is not the case if you are using GRUB and is unnecessary if you are
using BootMagic or System Com.
BTW I have never used BM but I do use SystemCom2000 and it works well.
On my non-MS system I use it to boot between 5 OSes.

   Charles  (-:

Forever never goes beyond tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris
Thompson
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 4:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SLU] HDD partitions


At 04:38 PM 12/8/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>During the installation of Win2000 you can use the advanced option and
>choose to which partition it is installed.
>Reguardless of where you install Win2000 it will overwrite LILO.
>Futhermore, I for 1 do not reccommend using LILO as a bootloader with
>Win2000.
>If you are not also using a distro such as Mandrake which includes GRUB I
>would use a commercial bootloader such as SystemCommander or BootMagic.

Personally, I could never get BootMagic to work properly.  LILO, on the
other hand, worked fine even when triple-booting.  Grub also works well.


_______________________________________________
Stormlinux-users-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stormix.com/community/lists/listinfo/stormlinux-users-list


_______________________________________________
Stormlinux-users-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stormix.com/community/lists/listinfo/stormlinux-users-list

Reply via email to