--- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 1:41 PM -0700 8/20/03, David Graham wrote: > >Because this is already provided by the *standard* taglib and Struts > >should be focused on providing things the standard doesn't. Struts > >already has mechanisms to construct urls with parameters. Extending > the > >standard tags to support Struts features is *much* more worthwhile than > >duplicating the standard tags. > > I'm sympathetic with this argument, but it seems to me that as long > as the non-EL tags are going to be supported, there should be no JSTL > dependency in the non-EL tags.
I never suggested that. A new tag that extends <c:url> would be required. The tags are still supported but aren't really in active development, especially tags that duplicate functionality found in the JSTL. > > David, would you -1 a solution along the lines that Chris Bare made, > which didn't extend a JSTL tag? I don't recall what that suggestion was. I wouldn't -1 an <html:param> tag but I do think it's a waste of time. David > > Joe > > -- > -- > Joe Germuska > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blog.germuska.com > "If nature worked that way, the universe would crash all the time." > --Jaron Lanier > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
