I haven't had a chance to catch up completely, but the outage this weekend suggests an after-Christmas 1.2.0 release, unfortunately - at least, if I need to be involved. (If not, great - go for it!)
-- Martin Cooper On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > OK, here's what we have > > * Release notes updated > * Issues w/o solutions marked LATER > * Webapps tested on TC 4.1 (one issue) > * JUnit tests run > > In the Validator example, we're suppose to be able to change selected > validations for a county just by overriding a form in a formset. This > doesn't work unless you respecify the entire formset. I fixed the > example, but we should decide if this is suppose to be a supported > feature or not. > > Here's what we don't have > > * Webapps tests on TC 3.3a (next) > * Patches/fixes applied for 11 issues <http://tinyurl.com/ysx3x> > * Cactus tests run (under Ant) > > I can't get Cactus running under Ant either, though Joe says they run > under Maven. > > If the Cactus tests are truly broken under Ant: > > Do we want to call that a showstopper? > > If so, do we want to workaround that by taking the Cactus tests out > of the buildfile for now, as we are moving to Maven anyway, and have Joe > apply his Maven-Cactus patch. > > I could apply the patches sometime this week, but I'm leary of doing so > when I can't get the Cactus tests to run on my own. > > If we resolve the Cactus thing quickly, do we want to release what we > have as 1.2.0 (w/o the 11 patches), with the intention of rolling 1.2.1 > in January, or wait and do this after Christmas? > > -Ted. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
