Couldn't you just configure your web.xml file to map all .jsp requests to some standard error page?
amir >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6:02:54 PM 04/29/02 >>> Or.... you could put your jsp's under the WEB-INF directory. Search posts from a few weeks ago about this. It's quite a lengthy and enlightening thread. JM > -----Original Message----- > From: Will Spies/Towers Perrin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:08 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Design question > > > > > Good idea but the other problem is your web server doesn't mix with > non-Struts applications. I was kinda hoping for a struts only solution. > Thanks for the idea though! > > > _______________________ > Will Spies > Towers Perrin > Phone: (215)246-7145 > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > To: "Struts > Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kevin.Bedell@sunl cc: (bcc: > Will Spies/Towers Perrin) > ife.com Subject: Re: > Design question > > > 04/29/02 03:51 PM > > Please respond to > > "Struts Users > > Mailing List" > > > > > > > > > > > > > Configure the web server to not recognize the .jsp mime type. Then any > link to a .jsp page will generate an "Error 404 Page Not Found". The > servlet mappings should still work fine. > > That being said, I've found that whenever I make a decision like > this based > on a design preference, I almost always find some unusual case where it > really makes sense to do things the way I've said shouldn't be done. > > > FWIW - > Kevin > > > > > > > > "Will Spies/Towers Perrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/29/2002 03:53:16 PM > > Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: (bcc: Kevin Bedell/Systems/USHO/SunLife) > Subject: Design question > > > > > > In my opinion, most ( if not all ) links should be Action URIs. > What I mean > is, struts views should not post to urls which are JSP struts views. > Rather, valid URLs that are posted to ( or even referenced in ) should > always be controllers. For those who agree with this philosophy, can you > give me some suggestions on how I can force this? One idea I've had is to > place a customized on top of all JSP views which checks for a hidden > request variable that only my controllers know about. So, if this request > variable is not found than the view craps out. Any other ideas? > > > > _______________________ > Will Spies > Towers Perrin > Phone: (215)246-7145 > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: < > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: < > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended > for the use > of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from > disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that > any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and erase this e-mail message immediately. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: < > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: < > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
