hi,     
        Can you please let me know of how do you get rid of this issuse ( i
mean setting up the validator so that i need not be 
connected to the net ) ... 

Thanks 
Guru

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2003 10:50
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: struts validator


I had initial trouble setting up the validator, mainly to do with it not
working when you try to validate the dtd with a machine not connected
to the net. It didn't give a good error explaining this. However, once I
realised this was the problem, and set up the validator properly, it works
really well. Especially, if, like me, you are new to javascript!
Brian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:18 AM
Subject: RE: struts validator


> You know, I just don't get it. I think Validator was a great idea that
> simply proved wrong in implementation.  And I know I am not alone it this
> assessment.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Kyser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:03 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: struts validator
>
>
> Like I said, I dont use client-side, and its been pretty smooth sailing
for
> me. Sorry your experience was different, but personally, I like it.
> Especially defining constants for validation masks and using them over and
> over on lots of different forms in different projects even. And the
> requiredif has been pretty handy for a number of cases to boot
>
> Of course, there are still cases where I need to go to
> validate() methods in the actions, but they are less
> and less, just as I use actual FormBeans less and less,
> now that i halfway grok DynaValidatorForms...
>
> cheers,
>
> -jeff
>
> On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 10:40  PM, Mark Galbreath wrote:
>
> > yeah, well, DUH!  When are you guys going to realize that Validator
> > should
> > never have come out here even in beta. It sucks.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Kyser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:25 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: struts validator
> >
> >
> > I only did server-side validations, using v1.1b3, until I saw lots of
> > people
> > complaining that v1.1rc1 wasn;t working for client-side validations.
> >
> > I tried it (rc1) and it didn't work for me either. I haven't messed
> > with the nightly builds - just went back to 1.1b3. Its probably been
> > fixed in the
> > latest, but since 1.1rc2 is coming out soon, figure I'll wait until
> > then to
> > check it out again.
> >
> > -jeff
> >
> > On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 08:18  PM, Mark Galbreath wrote:
> >
> >> Beats me, dude.  I struggled with it for 3 days and said enough is
> >> enough, and wrote my own validations in my Action classes.  If you
> >> look through the
> >> mail archive, you'll see right off that this is what happens to the
> >> majority
> >> of people trying to get Validator to work.
> >>
> >> Good luck,
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Frances Aleah Z. de Guzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:55 PM
> >> To: Struts Users Mailing List; Mark Galbreath
> >> Subject: Re: struts validator
> >>
> >>
> >> how can i fix it?
> >>
> >> On Friday 30 May 2003 08:20 pm, Mark Galbreath wrote:
> >>> That's because the Validator works by magic and you obviously have a
> >>> hex in your machine.
> >>>
> >>> (sometimes I kill myself)
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Frances Aleah Z. de Guzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 2:49 AM
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: struts validator
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> struts validator (client side validation) example is not working in
> >>> my pc, even the struts example. but it is working with the other pcs
> >>> in our office.
> >>>
> >>> i noticed that when i view the page source there is no javascript
> >>> generated unlike in the other pc. is there still i have to configure
> >>> or what? im using
> >>>
> >>> struts rc1.1 and j2sdk 1.4.1_02 and tomcat 4.1.24 as the web server
> >>> and sometimes JBOSS 3.0.6
> >>
> >> --
> >> Frances Aleah Z. De Guzman
> >> SA/Programmer
> >> Ingenium Technology, Inc.
> >> http://www.ingenium.com.ph
> >>
> >> Disclaimer :
> >> This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not
> >> the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
> >> distributing
> >> or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information
> >> is
> >> strictly prohibited.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to