On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Giampiero De Ciantis wrote:
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:29:56 -0400 > From: Giampiero De Ciantis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [OT] MVC / Model 2 for Microsoft ??? > > I don't think that the current ASP .NET model is too far off of the MVC > path. Mostly I think that MVC isn't enforced, but the foundation is > inherently there. > > If I had to do a mapping from struts to ASP .NET I would put things like > this: > > .jsp --> .aspx > ActionForm --> Code behind page of .aspx > Action --> Code behind page of .aspx > Model --> any .NET classes or Com objects that your Code behind page calls. > If you peruse some of the Microsoft-related public mailing lists, you'll note that code-behind pages are not universally popular among Microsoft based developers -- it seems that more than a few people like to code things directly in their ASP pages, instead of having any separation. In other words, it's the old "Model 1 or Model 2" debate again :-) Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
