> On Nov 30, 2025, at 13:28, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ok, we now have an artifact that is built against the LTS version of Qt 6 --
> likely a better plan, anyway. And that one will run on macOS 12.3 or newer.
>
>
> https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface/suites/51074738218/artifacts/4715818431
>
> This is an x86 binary, I'll switch the arm one to be build with the same
> stack as well. And stop building 6.10.1 based ones, I guess. Not really any
> point to them AFAICT
>
> Now we need to get some testing for those to make sure I didn't break
> anything in the process - and to understand what (besides printing and
> integrated user manual) is missing.
>
> Likely the best way to do this is to simply merge this and have it be part of
> the next 'current' build, I guess.
>
> But if any of you Mac users would like to give it a spin, please be my guest.
> The x86 binary above will of course work on Apple Silicon Macs as well.
Here are the latest binaries for macOS to test:
Artifacts:
Subsurface-MacOS-arm64-qt-6.8.3-6.0.5492-patch.54.pull-request.dirkhh-macos
<https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface/suites/51106410048/artifacts/4719423931>
Subsurface-MacOS-x86_64-qt-6.8.3-6.0.5492-patch.54.pull-request.dirkhh-macos
<https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface/suites/51106410048/artifacts/4719484962>
Should work on macOS 12.3 and newer. They are unsigned so they may require some
nudging to get macOS to be happy...
/D
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
