On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:34:29PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote: > I think that's a great idea - will be very helpful in identifying the > "classics".
It'd be great if the classifications found happened to, or could be easily made to, be sensibly related to the classifications used for quite some time now: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Taxonomy Somthing like: "SL-maintained" / "classics" / "core" <--> Fructose "community-maintained" / "others" <--> Honey "pre-installed [on SoaS]" <--> Starch/Cellulose I'm not saying the existing Taxonomy is the sexiest or most-comprehensible-to-the-outsider, but it's well-aligned with the development/deployment processes and if we promote a completely orthogonal categorization it may cause a troublesome impedence mismatch. > thanks > > Sean Martin
pgpidq48EhIN6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
