Martin,
I phrased that poorly. A kid might care that James Simmons wrote Read
Etexts. He probably won't care if James Simmons is a part of Sugar
Labs, or part of the community, or if it was part of GCompris, or if we
consider Read Etexts part of Glucose, Sucrose, Fructose, etc.
If a kid accidentally removes the Moon Activity and wants it back he
might look in Math and Science or he might look in Pre-Installed. It
should be listed in both places.
As far as Dominick's vs. Costco, I enjoy the time I spend at Costco and
hate the time I spend at Dominick's. A good taxonomy would encourage a
kid to explore the site and see what's available. A poor one would make
him feel like I do on Sunday afternoons, wondering why canned tomatoes
are in a totally different aisle than other canned vegetables, or why
Pita bread isn't with the rest of the bread, or why Blue or Feta cheese
isn't with the rest of the cheese in the Dairy section, etc.
James Simmons
Martin Dengler wrote:
Other than that, does any kid or teacher care who maintains an
Activity?
Clearly you view the answer as "no" (I think in general, the right
answer is "not unless they can get something out of that person",
which is a distinct possibility in FOSS-land, so actually I think the
answer should be "they should because it can help them"). I don't
know what point you're making, expect possibly "we needn't care about
aslo's coherency for anyone other than 'learners'".
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
