Tom Semadeni ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Jim^2, [Sorry, couldn't resist.]
> Aren't we trying to lay out marks FROM a computer screen or a piece
> of paper TO the real thing on the ground? So aren't we trying to
> FIND the radii of the "distance circles" GIVEN the coordinates of
> the target point and the location of the second reference point that
> Ron refers to? That being the case here are my calcs using Ron
> Anthony's A and B when he first surfaced this two reference point
> approach on Tue, 25 May 1999 14:17:32 -0700 , after he awoke from
> his semi-sleep! ;-)
You are correct. However, someone (John Carmichael perhaps?) posed
the inverse problem, and that is what Jim and I answered.
Jim
------------------- ---------------------- --------------------
| Jim Cobb | 540 Arapeen Dr. #100 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Parametric | Salt Lake City, UT | (801)-588-4632 |
| Technology Corp. | 84108-1202 | Fax (801)-588-4650 |
------------------- ---------------------- --------------------
If a man's wit be wandering, let him study the mathematics.
-- Francis Bacon
