Ray_Net wrote: >The problem is created by optimist guys >putting the "Gold" status too early
The KDE team had a similar problem with KDE 4.0. To get anyone to write apps for the updated codebase, they had to remove the Beta status. They, however, noted that 4.0 was a *This will eat your children* release (though Fedora ignored that and shipped it anyway.) With 4.1, the KDE team again stated *This will STILL eat your children*. The problems stem from an inadequate numbering system; the Linux kernel has a solution to this (odd/even). Now that there has been enough feedback to weed out the problems, KDE 4.2 and KDE 4.3 are getting glowing reviews. If more folks would use and give feedback on the _pre-release_ versions of SeaMonkey, perhaps the point-zero release wouldn't be so traumatic. As it is, apparently eveyone waits till the formal release then gets their knickers in a knot and can't wait to bitch. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
