User: >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> And did you try my suggestion with safe-mode in this time frame? That >> should always be the first step when recognizing oddities. > >Can you advise how using safe mode would make a difference in >isolating this problem? I do not have any add-ons or extensions >installed with SM 2 whatsoever.
Did you mention this fact already? ;) >I have always used SM 1.X and 2.X in its default original >configuration without installing additional components. Safe-mode will not only test for broken extensions but also uses a new profile. In short, one of the first step to examine oddities should always be safe-mode. But certainly you can ignore me. And i am now tired. Bye. Hartmut _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
