Arnie Goetchius wrote: > Jens Hatlak wrote: >> Arnie Goetchius wrote: > >> SM 2.1 website compatibility should be better in general, though, >> since it now advertises itself as Firefox in addition to SeaMonkey. > > FWIW, I can log into http://adwords.microsoft.com with 2.1 without > getting an "incompatible" browser error message. I get an error > message using 2.010 > > However, I still get "incompatible" browser error message when > logging into http://adwords.google.com with SM 2.1. No error message > if I log in with FF 3.6
I get 404s for both of those 'adwords' URLs ... no error, just missing. Personally, I can't see any advantage to a browser utility that sends some kind of error message to a web site. There are sooooo many broken sites out there that (if this reporting thingy became popular) webmasters would start directing all such messages to dev/null. I can envision users-without-clue sending hundreds/thousands of these reports and possibly causing the site authors to ban access by those browsers. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
