Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
SM 2.1 website compatibility should be better in general, though,
since it now advertises itself as Firefox in addition to SeaMonkey.
FWIW, I can log into http://adwords.microsoft.com with 2.1 without
getting an "incompatible" browser error message. I get an error
message using 2.010
However, I still get "incompatible" browser error message when
logging into http://adwords.google.com with SM 2.1. No error message
if I log in with FF 3.6
I get 404s for both of those 'adwords' URLs ... no error, just missing.
Should have been:
http://adcenter.microsoft.com
https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=adwords
Sorry for my error. sigh
Personally, I can't see any advantage to a browser utility that sends
some kind of error message to a web site. There are sooooo many broken
sites out there that (if this reporting thingy became popular)
webmasters would start directing all such messages to dev/null. I can
envision users-without-clue sending hundreds/thousands of these reports
and possibly causing the site authors to ban access by those browsers.
Good point. There are enough of us without a clue to not add any more ;)
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
