Arnie Goetchius wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Arnie Goetchius wrote: >>> However, I still get "incompatible" browser error message when >>> logging into http://adwords.google.com with SM 2.1. No error >>> message if I log in with FF 3.6 >> >> I get 404s for both of those 'adwords' URLs ... no error, just missing. > > Should have been: > http://adcenter.microsoft.com > https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=adwords > Sorry for my error. sigh
Ah, thanks. I see what you mean with the Microsloth site. Setting my UA to any of Ipod, Iphone, Iceweasel, Firefox Linux, multiple Operas including Opera Mobile, and my favorite Borgzilla, I am rejected. Works fine as any IE version... but then it is a Microsloth site. I had no problem with the Google site with any of the above UAs. Since that MS site is looking for advertisers/revenue, I am truly confused why they even care about what browser the prospective spender of money would be using. Oh wait .. it's Microsloth. My Borgzilla is humor: Borgzilla/31.0 (X11;U;Linux i686;en-US;rv:31.0) Resistance is futile >> Personally, I can't see any advantage to a browser utility that sends >> some kind of error message to a web site. There are sooooo many broken >> sites out there that (if this reporting thingy became popular) >> webmasters would start directing all such messages to dev/null. I can >> envision users-without-clue sending hundreds/thousands of these reports >> and possibly causing the site authors to ban access by those browsers. > > Good point. There are enough of us without a clue to not add any more ;) I'd consider you to be in the Have Clue category, Arnie. <g> -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
