On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:47:36 -0500, JohnW-Mpls <john...@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:25:33 -0400, Stan <s.c.pie...@comcast.net> >wrote: > >>I'd like to express my appreciation to all the developers and others who >>have devoted themselves to keeping SeaMonkey alive and still the most >>logical way for integrating browser, mail, newsgroups, and other things. >> >>I started in 1997 with Netscape and thanks to so many of you I am still >>going strong on that path with SeaMonkey. Thank you again for making >>this possible. >> >>Stan Pierce > >I'm with you in appreciating efforts to continue the old Netscape >grouping. I use all four, have friends who I talked into using SM >composer for HTML work. I don't use SM mail for news - got hooked on >Agent long ago - but have six mail accounts to keep me happy (I sure >like SM's mail-address book arrangement for addressing emails). > >However, I have a couple websites where some parts do not work for my >SM browser but do work for other brands (IE, FF, Safari, Opera). My >complaints have been met with "it works for us" reply - hard to fight >that when all communication is via their customer. One newer site is a >client's site that I now go to frequently. I hafta try using FF as my >browser and see how comfortable I am working that way. That trip to FF did not last long. Finding and using downloads was fine but the top bars got too confusing and that was compounded by overeager pushing of all kinds of wonderful add ons/ins and plugs. So, back to SM's browser normally and use FF for those pages where a website has trouble with SM. -- JohnW-Mpls _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
