On 2013-08-03 2:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-08-02 19:08 (GMT-0400) Chris Ilias composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-08-01 06:44 (GMT+0900) Trane Francks composed:
So, uh, who exactly thought this was moving forward? For those of us
who
The same people who have been removing other features at every
opportunity, trying to dumb Mozilla products down to the level of Google
products.
Felix, please don't spread misinformation in the support forums. People
may actually take you seriously. ;)
I don't feel what I wrote to be untrue. I find Google Chrom* to be
hopelessly limiting except WRT Flash support.
Maybe it was misleading, as I didn't mean to imply SM devs have such
goals, just those working on FF and such foundational components (e.g.
Gecko & Necko) as are necessary to further FF developer agenda.
In that case, I'm correcting you. :) While I'm not sure what you're
referring to by "dumb down", that is certainly not the agenda. If you're
referring to design decisions, then it's not even the same people that
proposed removing Growl support.
And I don't see what any of this has to do Chrome.
I've set replies to this post to go to my email address. If you'd like
to reply, please provide a valid return address, thanks.
--
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
Newsgroup moderator
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
