I think it will work better with a "dummy" ip.  But it will work
without a ip as well now.

Scott

On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 12:11 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > All these issues have been fixed.  Please wait until the next version.
>
> Sure.  I'm checking mirrors and your home directory every day for new
> stuff to try :)
>
> So what is going to be official way for bridging mode  ? Is it no IP for
> LAN or  same as WAN ?
>
>
>
> > On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've recently tried number of variants of setting pfsense in Bridging
> > > mode of my small subnet and I guess here is the state of things as it is
> > > now.
> > >
> > > Scott was going to fix some of these issues but I guess it is good to
> > > summarize them anyway.
> > >
> > > So running in bridging mode you set  111.111.111.154/29 as IP on your
> > > WAN interface. Your options for LAN are
> > >
> > > 1)  Set LAN ip empty.
> > > You're allowed to set IP empty but this breaks a lot of rules in pf
> > > tables, as lan IP does not exist any more.  And check does not seems to
> > > present.
> > >
> > > 2) Set lan IP address to be the same as WAN IP.  This is also allowed,
> > > but It breaks "wan spoof protection" rule which does not seems like can
> > > be disabled.  I was told  "Block traffic from private networks does it"
> > > but by my tests it does not.
> > >
> > > 3) Set lan IP address to be some fake one, I used 10.25.15.1.
> > > In this case it is the closet to be functional.  It however does not
> > > identify LAN subnet right so firewall rules which include lan subnet do
> > > not work. There are some lesser items such as lockout protection does
> > > not work and this kind of stuff:
> > >
> > > (All these rules have LAN wrong)
> > >
> > > nat on em0 from 10.25.15.0/29 port 500 to any port 500 -> (em0) port 500
> > > nat on em0 from 10.25.15.0/29 to any -> (em0)
> > > pass in quick on em1 proto udp from any port = 68 to 10.25.15.1 port =
> > > 67 label "allow access to DHCP server on LAN"
> > > pass out quick on em1 proto udp from 10.25.15.1 port = 67 to any port =
> > > 68 label "allow access to DHCP server on LAN"
> > > block in log quick on em0 from 10.25.15.0/29 to any label "WAN spoof
> > > check"
> > > block in log quick on em0 proto udp from any port = 67 to 10.25.15.0/29
> > > port = 68 label "allow dhcp client out wan"
> > > pass in quick from 10.25.15.0/29 to 10.25.15.1 keep state label
> > > "anti-lockout web rule"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How I would expect it to work ?
> > >
> > > Leave it empty or set it same as WAN I think one or another should be
> > > made to work.  Wan spoofing should not be enabled in such case and  LAN
> > > network should be made identified correctly  for setting firewall
> > > rules.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to