2009/3/19 "Alexandre F. Guimarães" <alexandre.fguimar...@gmail.com>
> I know of that, today, We have two Uplinks with Global Crossing (100Mbits) > and Interlig Telecom (100Mbits), for this rates, I need use gigabit cards of > course, And thinking that the packets have 1500 of MTU, the PPS are low... > But, We are instaling Cisco Router, Telephony and other things related to > PSTN e E1 Voice Links and more... the packets are more higher using > telephony over the data links. > > The previsioning of 300kpps is for me slepping well, if you can understand > me, today, I don´t need data rates mora than 150Mbits per seconds, what I > need is a good hardware interface to make things goes alright... > > > > > At 01:15 19/3/2009, you wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Victor Padro <vpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Intel 1Gbps are the best for routing, data transfer, etc. >> > Although intel pro 100Mbps are quite alright in a 300 kbps routing >> > enviroment. >> >> thousands of PACKETs per second, not bits. You'd need a bit more than >> 100Mbit capable nic to route 300kpps ;) >> >> --Bill >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com >> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com >> >> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com > For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com > > Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org > > Cisco and Intel Gigabit(PCI-e) get along ok when they transport more than 50kpps. -- "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas"
