On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Chris Buechler <cbuech...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's quite a bit of irony in using FTP yet wanting to be PCI compliant. >
I suppose to some extent. However, it is the ideal tool for the job of collecting large data files from arbitrary customers who do not have their own servers, and only need to upload a file once ever. If only sftp had "anonymous" mode I'd be a happy guy :-) > But to the point, what exactly is the setup you have here? NAT, public > IPs routed, bridged? I get dropped when trying an invalid port. > Plain old NAT on the firewall. There's a hardware load balancer in front, but it is just doing pass-thru for this IP. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
