2010/11/20 Karsten Becker <karsten.bec...@ecologic.eu>:
> On 11/20/2010 09:04 PM, Frédéric Boiteux wrote:
>> I'm not sure to understand well : in the case I gave, 192.168.1.0/24 and
>> 192.168.2.0/24, the two nets don't share the same broadcast domain
>> (192.168.1.255 and 192.168.2.255), isn't it ?
>
> I'm also in doubt.
>
> Because your example is exactly why I see the need to have two subnets
> on the same interface.
>
> I have one subnet for VoIP phones and one for computers, just to have
> the f*cking broadcasting from Windows not bailing onto my phones which
> makes them slow and #+?1-up the speech quality. So I need to have both
> subnets on the FW interface to reach both the internet.
>

A broadcast domain is the layer 2 segregation of the network. If
you're not using VLANs, and have one switch, you have one broadcast
domain. The broadcast address is different, but those broadcasts all
go to every device. In the case of buggy phone firmware maybe they
don't listen to the broadcast address on other subnets, but they're
still receiving those broadcasts and still on the same broadcast
domain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_domain

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org

Reply via email to