I do this all the time and using a separate nic is simpler and easier to
manage than an alias. Unless I am missing something, a vlan for this case is
overkill.

------------------
Richard


On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:13 PM, David Burgess <apt....@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:51 PM, fi...@7technw.com <fi...@7technw.com>
> wrote:
> > Another easy solution is to just add another nic.
>
> Not an option in this case. The OP described a wireless network where
> the client subnet and management subnet exist on the same physical
> network. You can't change that in this case, so your two options are
> to separate them virtually (vlans) or just run them on the same
> physical network.
>
> Yes, he could use another NIC and plug it into a switch along with the
> first NIC and the wireless network, but this still doesn't separate
> the two networks, and is no better than creating an alias on the
> existing NIC.
>
> db
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>
> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>
>

Reply via email to