On 12/22/2010 11:59 PM, newme...@aol.com wrote: > Stefan: > >> Was that easy enough? <g> :-) > > Sure but how does it SOUND??
it sounds good, without having to jump through too many hoops in the mixing stage (in fact, the workflow is a lot more straightforward than for discrete multichannel approaches, and another big plus is abstraction from the target speaker layout with reasonable up- and downwards compatibility. *.* personally, i'm not terribly interested in any pie-in-the-sky attempts at ambisonic world dominiation - i will continue to build ambisonic systems as well as possible, one at a time, and try to make good higher order recordings, also one at a time... i've had my share of vendor consortium marketing lingo the other month (http://auro-3d.com), and i'm not at all inclined to join a working group and attend meetings when i could be out recording :) but if some ambisonic evangelist wants to take the plunge, i'm happy to provide them with empirical backing or arrange HOA demonstrations. best, jörn -- Jörn Nettingsmeier Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487 Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio), Elektrofachkraft Audio and event engineer - Ambisonic surround recordings http://stackingdwarves.net _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
