On 3 Apr 2012, at 21:26, Rev Tony Newnham <revtonynewn...@blueyonder.co.uk> 
wrote:

> What about "Apple lossless compression", Quicktime - and so on?
> 
>> Apple has no history of pushing proprietary file formats, except for DRM.

Apple Lossless is fully published: 

http://alac.macosforge.org/

It's reason to exist is that Apple made an engineering choice: that less 
compute cycles during playback (i.e. battery life on portable devices) is more 
important than fast compression (which is done only once) or the ultimate in 
compression ratio (storage gets cheaper, but devices and batteries shrink, so 
battery life is always going to be a challenge).

Again, it's FUD when people think Apple is needlessly proprietary. As a matter 
of fact, when it comes to standards Apple does more to push them than just 
about any other force in the market. Others push things like Flash, 


> Quicktime

Quicktime was way ahead of its time and actually is the foundation of MPEG4, 
which has a container format directly based on Quicktime. With the arrival of 
MP4 Apple pretty much only uses that format, and retains the older versions 
only for backwards compatibility. All the stuff you find in the iTunes store 
are now MP4 based, i.e. m4v and m4a, whereby only the DRM is proprietary at the 
request of the content providers. The container format itself is open and 
anyone can create and read m4v/m4a files as long as they don't try to use the 
FairPlay DRM, which is kind of obvious, because if everyone could decode the 
DRM, there wouldn't be a need for DRM in the first place.

> and so on?

Can't answer that part of the question, because it's not specified in any 
meaningful way.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to