Thanks the correction. Yes, the move was N3D _to_ SN3D.
Three years on from the original proposal and one on from the improvements, hopefully this is stable ( ... unless there any seismic improvemnts at York ???). Michael > The 2011 paper by Nachbar, et al, "ambiX - A Suggested Ambisonics > Format", specifies SN3D as the normalization scheme. (see eqn 3 in > section 2.1, "The normalization that seems most agreeable is SN3D...") > > The papers are here > http://ambisonics.iem.at/proceedings-of-the-ambisonics-symposium-2011 > > -- > Aaron Heller (hel...@ai.sri.com) > Menlo Park, CA US > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Michael Chapman <s...@mchapman.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>>>> Unless of course they publish a file format for it.... >>>> >>>> Want a minimal and purposely highly (even overtly) extensible one? >>>> That >>>> I can design. In fact I've meant to do something like this from >>>> teenage >>>> up. :) >>> >>> Please do! >>> >> >> A group of us proposed a CAF based file format at Graz (in 2009) >> <http://mchapman.com/amb/reprints/AFF.pdf> >> It had a mixed response ;-)> >> >> It has though been taken forward and a further proposal was >> made at the US Ambisonics symposium by Christian Nachbar (Graz) >> and colleagues. (N3D instead of SN3D, being one major change.) >> >> Time has brought greater agreement and stability. >> >> As I wasn't at York, and as the Graz folks are on this List, I >> won't give a reference as it would probably be out-of-date, >> anyway. >> >> So problem solved .... >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sursound mailing list >> Sursound@music.vt.edu >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
