If speaker positions are expressed in terms of azimuth, elevation and
distance, the numbering could be a function of those 3 parameters.
--
Marc 

Le Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:03:44 +0000,
Dave Malham <dave.mal...@york.ac.uk> a écrit :

> Absolutely - there speaks the voice of long experience. Never, never
> blindly trust labels on cables. If you do, sooner or later they'll
> turn round and bite. Labels help vastly but always run test signals
> to check things to be sure. Incidentally, Trinov make a 3-d mic
> system that is specifically designed for making acoustic measurements
> including, most importantly for this discussion, loudspeaker
> positions. See http://www.trinnov.com/technologies/3d-microphone/ .
> If you can measure the speaker positions directly (and have the time
> before the gig!) that avoids the need to get the labels right
> since,assuming you can route signals flexibly in your source system,
> you can just get everything right there.
> 
> If you don't want to do the acoustic measurements, just get the
> loudspeaker positions, a similar job can be done with cheaper,
> unmatched, electrets spaced more widely so that simple time-of-flight
> measurements can be used rather than acoustic analysis as I belief
> Trinnov are doing. That way you've only got the connections to the
> measurement system to get right to ensure you've gotten the speakers
> connected appropriately for your purposes.
> 
>    Dave
> 
> On 19 November 2016 at 12:50, David Pickett <d...@fugato.com> wrote:
> 
> > In order to check that everything is correct, despite one's
> > impeccable logic in imagining a virtual transformation matrix
> > between how one thinks the signals should be numbered and the
> > reality of the specific situation, I recommend that everyone have a
> > test recording that identifies each channel.  With this it is
> > relatively easy to check and correct, while avoiding total
> > confusion.
> >
> > David
> >
> > At 14:21 17-11-16, Peter Lennox wrote:  
> > >I once spent two days trying to understand the mapping of a 32
> > >(periphonic) speaker rig, as there were 3 different speaker
> > >numbering 'conventions' in use, by 3 different parties: one used
> > >counterclockwise numbering of 'slices' - middle, top, bottom,
> > >another used a similar system but clockwise, and another used
> > >weird kind of helical 'start at the top, downwards in stripes',
> > >kind of system. Each party thought their system was logical and
> > >obvious, so it didn't need documenting.
> > >Trying to understand what was actually wired to what was a
> > >comical  
> > nightmare.  
> > >
> > >Dr. Peter Lennox
> > >Senior Lecturer in Perception
> > >College of Arts
> > >University of Derby, UK
> > >e: p.len...@derby.ac.uk
> > >t: 01332 593155
> > >https://derby.academia.edu/peterlennox
> > >https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Lennox
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of
> > >Dave  
> > Malham  
> > >Sent: 17 November 2016 11:10
> > >To: Surround Sound discussion group <sursound@music.vt.edu>
> > >Subject: Re: [Sursound] Speaker numbering
> > >
> > >Your second layout is what I always tended to do when I had
> > >control of the numbering but when working in a venue other than
> > >your own you often  
> > don't.  
> > >Personally, I'm not sure about "standards" for something as
> > >variable as a multispeaker array since I would ALWAYS want to
> > >check that they really, really were connected to the standard - I
> > >have been caught out too many times over the years :-(
> > >
> > >    Dave
> > >
> > >PS Actually, I would usually check my own rig, just in case someone
> > >had played silly buggers with the leads since last time I used it.
> > >Like I said, been caught out too many times....
> > >
> > >
> > >On 16 November 2016 at 22:12, Augustine Leudar
> > ><augustineleu...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >wrote:
> > >  
> > >> How do you number you arrays - there seems to be two ways I've
> > >> come across.. Using the example of an octophonic array The first
> > >> way seems to be circular :
> > >>
> > >>   1   2
> > >> 8        3
> > >> 7        4
> > >>    6   5
> > >>
> > >> The other way is as follows :
> > >>
> > >>    1  2
> > >> 3       4
> > >> 5       6
> > >>    7  8
> > >>
> > >> There doesnt seem to be an standard way of doing this - I was
> > >> curious as to how other sursounders number their speakers ?
> > >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> > >> scrubbed...
> > >> URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/>>  
> > attachments/20161116/493aaff8/attachment.html>  
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Sursound mailing list
> > >> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe
> > >> here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
> > >>  
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >
> > >As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University.
> > >
> > >These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the
> > >University
> > >
> > >Dave Malham
> > >Honorary Fellow, Department of Music
> > >The University of York
> > >York YO10 5DD
> > >UK
> > >
> > >'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
> > >-------------- next part --------------
> > >An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > >URL:
> > ><https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/201611  
> > >17/5bf90225/attachment.html>  
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Sursound mailing list
> > >Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > >https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe
> > >here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
> > >
> > >
> > >The University of Derby has a published policy regarding email and
> > >reserves the right to monitor email traffic.
> > >If you believe this was sent to you in error, please reply to the
> > >sender and let them know.
> > >
> > >Key University contacts: http://www.derby.ac.uk/its/contacts/
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Sursound mailing list
> > >Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > >https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe
> > >here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.  
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sursound mailing list
> > Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe
> > here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
> >  
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to