Michael Perry wrote:
>
> On 6 Mar, Jerry Lynn Kreps wrote:
> <sniperoo>
<ditto>
>
> Have others installed the gnome 1.0.1 rpms? Did you have self compiled
> gtk/glib libs installed or did you do rpms for everything? Im just
> curious because I definitely wanted my self-compiled gtk/glib there
> because the rpm's could never be found when I attempted compiling
> sources. When I compiled xchast last nite it found my self-compiled
> stuff first time.
I haven't looked at gnome yet. I'm going to wait until they clean it up
a bit. I think they did harm to their cause by releasing what many are
calling a "beta" or even "alpha" version because of it's incompleteness
and lack of stability, it what some are saying is true. ???
I downloaded and installed gtk from tarballs. In fact, because of some
problems with the rpm program itself I have switched to using tarballs,
except for when YaST uses it.
>
> I dont really know if broke anything but I dont believe I did because
> everything works exceedingly well here. If people are interested, I
> could post some basic comments about changes between the 99.8 and the
> release. There are some things I did not see in the 99.8 release that
> may have been there in cvs releases. There is a gnome-ppp applet now
> and a few other things which are a bit different. The menus seem
> somewhat better thought out, etc.
So, from your experience, is it reasonably stable or still shakey?
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
