On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:37:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 18 September 2006 18:32, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > > > > > It also was always dog slow with in-kernel suspend. > > > > > > Have you tried the latest -mm? > > > > No. Should i? > > It contains some patches that should increase I/O performance about 2 times > at the expense of some more memory needed during the suspend (if there's > not enough memory for the asynchronous writing, it will suspend anyway, but > as slowly as without the patches ;-) ).
Ok, but these are improvements for userspace suspend, not for in-kernel? I already noticed that a little bit smaller image helps a lot, since more memory is free for buffering. -- Stefan Seyfried \ "I didn't want to write for pay. I QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices \ wanted to be paid for what I write." SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg \ -- Leonard Cohen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
