On Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:40, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:37:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 18 September 2006 18:32, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > >
> > > > > It also was always dog slow with in-kernel suspend.
> > > >
> > > > Have you tried the latest -mm?
> > >
> > > No. Should i?
> >
> > It contains some patches that should increase I/O performance about 2 times
> > at the expense of some more memory needed during the suspend (if there's
> > not enough memory for the asynchronous writing, it will suspend anyway, but
> > as slowly as without the patches ;-) ).
>
> Ok, but these are improvements for userspace suspend, not for in-kernel?
No, they are for in-kernel. :-)
> I already noticed that a little bit smaller image helps a lot, since more
> memory is free for buffering.
Yes, but for the in-kernel thing the image must be much smaller (like 25% at
least).
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
