On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 05:34:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > I'm not saying HAL people should keep their whitelist. We should do it > exactly once, do it in s2ram, and do it right.
They already do not use s2ram because "it is another dependency". Crap, i know, but that's reality. > That whitelist should have been in kernel; we can't do that, but it > still makes sense to keep it at low level. Then go ahead and push that to them. You also need to be able to tell the user if he can suspend - right now he can't know, unless he is root - and you need an easy way to update the whitelist without updating the suspend package. And vendors need to be able to put data for their machine into the database, without updating the suspend package. "They" are not discussing, "they" are already implementing all that ;-) -- Stefan Seyfried "Any ideas, John?" "Well, surrounding them's out." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
