"Lee K. Seitz" wrote: > > them in to get one.) Many people have it at the top of their wanted > list, but (even discounting one-of-a-kind prototypes) there are > certainly other games that are rarer. What's rarer than a one-of-a-kind prototype? I thought prototypes were the Holy Grail of cart collecting... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to the swcollect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect' Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Jim Leonard
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Lee K. Seitz
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Jim Leonard
- RE: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Hugh Falk
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Lee K. Seitz
- RE: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Hugh Falk
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Jim Leonard
- RE: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Hugh Falk
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collector... Jim Leonard
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors Lee K. Seitz
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors Jim Leonard
- Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors Lee K. Seitz
- [SWCollect] Data or Packaging...which is more valuable? Hugh Falk
- Re: [SWCollect] Data or Packaging...which is more valuab... Lee K. Seitz
- RE: [SWCollect] Data or Packaging...which is more va... Hugh Falk
- Re: [SWCollect] Data or Packaging...which is mor... Jim Leonard
- RE: [SWCollect] Data or Packaging...which is... Hugh Falk
- Re: [SWCollect] Data or Packaging...whi... Jim Leonard
- Re: [SWCollect] Data or Packaging...which is more va... Jim Leonard