Oh, and I forgot: don’t use any form of equalization or Dolby noise reduction! That will certainly cause problems.

 


From: Per-Olof Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 15 mars 2004 15:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SWCollect] Here we go.....

 

Sampling should be fine, especially with a Vic tape which probably doesn’t have any turbo-loader thingie built-in (those tapes can be pretty tricky).

 

Just make sure you sample in MONO! On some tapes you get better results by doing an 8-bit sample by the way, you might want to try that too. 8 bits, less room for “nuances” -> less possible errors. At least the theory is sound. ;)

 

Cheers,

Peo

 


From: Vincent Joguin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 15 mars 2004 13:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Here we go.....

 

At 07:12 15/03/2004 -0500, you wrote:

In a message dated 03/15/2004 6:10:11 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

To what medium did you copy it? WAV file or another tape?


Another tape.


Mmm. Not the best (although that's already a very good thing). Since you're not going to sell your original copy (I hope!), it's not a hurry, but do you think you would have the necessary hardware/software to digitalize your original tape? I think any recent Sound Blaster or equivalent should be enough, with some sampling software (some software included in Windows may be enough), and an audio cable from a tape player to your sound card.

Trix (or anyone else), do you have any idea of how to *really* correctly preserve tapes? I'm more on the floppy disk side of things, so I may be wrong about the tape quality preservation...

Vincent.

Reply via email to