Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:27:03PM +0000, Andy Davidson wrote: >> Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: >>> some time ago we already discussed that there's no killer application that >>> would >>> push the ipv6 deployment forward. >> Errr, more addresses..... >> >> Wait until there's no more v4 left. Bang. Killer app. >> > > Oh please, I hear this argument since years and it will just not happen. > Instead of a killer app we should look for an IPv6 killer. It would make > the internet a much better place without this clumsy fat and badly > over-designed protocol and it would make an end to all this stupid threads.
One size does not fit all.... You are btw always enticed to write up a good document containing all the 'clumsy fat' and 'bad' things and pass that to the IETF as a draft and possibly better push it as an Informational RFC so that the next round of IPng comes up those considerations are taken into account... Greets, Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
