Jeroen Massar schrieb: > Rainer Duffner wrote: > [..] > >> How does that work on IPV6 anyway? >> I read that RBLs will be dead in IPV6-land, due to the fact that the >> address-space can't be packed in a database anymore.. >> > > The person who writes that does not realize how much easier it becomes. > > RBLs will simply take a scheme of: > > Register in db a max of 5 spamming IPs in the database per /64, > "" "" "" 50 spamming /64's per /48 > "" "" "" 500 spamming /48's per /32 > > The '5' is variable of course. Too much spam, just block the whole /32 > unless they clean it up. Verrrryy easy. > > Heck for that matter similar system could be employed for IPv4: > >
Spamhaus does that, AFAIK. > Register in db a max of 5 spamming IPs in the database per /24, > "" "" "" 50 spamming /24's per ASN > > Tada, block out the whole ASN when it hits the threshold. Then again, > there won't be much mail coming out of there in those cases. > > Also, politically all /48's should be registered in WHOIS, which is of > course a good thing. It seems though that there is no enforcement there > and most ISPs don't care at all though. > > >> Currently, RBLs are an important part of our spam-defence. >> > > You do mean as a scoring method I hope... > > Yes, but we also block. Mostly dynamic IPs and stuff on the swinog/IX-RBL. On my own mailserver, I block all Asian IPs ;-) Rainer _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
