Hi Daniel, On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Daniel Owens <dhow...@pmbx.net> wrote:
> Well, it may be a poor markup choice on my part, but the Strongs modules > are marked up the same way. I was just following the established pattern. > > I can see a couple of reasons to include a title in addition to the key: > - Normally attributes are not displayed, only the content of elements, > except @n in TEI and sometimes @osisID in OSIS genbooks (?) > - I could see cases in which a lexicon key would not be identical to its > title or head term, such as a full BDB module keyed to Strongs. The use of > Strongs numbers in that case would be purely for the software to find the > correct entry from a Bible tagged with Strongs numbers, not a part of the > actual lexicon entry > Wouldn't it be best to only display the two if they were different from each other, irrespective of what the TEI markup looked like? Jon
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page