On 04/29/2012 07:28 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Daniel Owens <dhow...@pmbx.net
<mailto:dhow...@pmbx.net>> wrote:
Well, it may be a poor markup choice on my part, but the Strongs
modules are marked up the same way. I was just following the
established pattern.
I can see a couple of reasons to include a title in addition to
the key:
- Normally attributes are not displayed, only the content of
elements, except @n in TEI and sometimes @osisID in OSIS genbooks (?)
- I could see cases in which a lexicon key would not be identical
to its title or head term, such as a full BDB module keyed to
Strongs. The use of Strongs numbers in that case would be purely
for the software to find the correct entry from a Bible tagged
with Strongs numbers, not a part of the actual lexicon entry
Wouldn't it be best to only display the two if they were different
from each other, irrespective of what the TEI markup looked like?
Jon
You are probably right. How would that work? Would the TEI filter need
to test whether the title and the key are identical? Even in the case of
Strongs, they are not identical: H0001 (or 00001) for the key and H1 for
the title.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page